|
Back to issue home page
May 2008
 To Branch or Not to Branch
 Banks explore technology's increasing potential for remote services
 By Candace Moonshower

Even as the majority of banking customers have weaned themselves away from their checkbooks to debit
card usage and decreased the number of times per year they visit a bank branch, there's still a
perception of banking as an old-fashioned industry. That's not a bad thing, says Jim Schmitz, Middle
Tennessee area executive for Regions Bank. Schmitz sees all the new technology coming online as more
opportunities to improve the relationship between bankers and customers. Jim Rieniets, president of
the new InsBank, agrees. Where the two executives agree to disagree, however, is on the efficacy of
bank branchesthe brick-and-mortar face of banking.
Schmitz is in a unique position to discuss the impact of technology on the banking business. "I
remember banking when there were no personal computers on the desks of executives," he recalls.
"Then along came ATMs, and the branches were not eliminated, as some folks predicted."
From a consumer perspective, banking is still a people business, Schmitz says. ATMs, telephone
banking, online banking, remote capture, wireless banking and even futuristic-sounding innovations
such as biometrics have not changed or eliminated the need for branches. "Getting a loan, opening
accountsthose are still face-to-face transactions. Yes, machines are convenient and, yes,
people on the phone are highly trained and have all the systems in place to take care of customer
issues, but we still focus on trying to make the banking experience a more personal, rewarding one
during those face-to-face contacts."
"Remote capture" has been a buzz phrase in banking for awhile now, and more banks are adopting this
technology every dayespecially smaller community or specialized banks. Regions Bank offers
remote capture, also called remote image deposit or merchant capture. With remote capture, business
customers can take the paper checks they receive in-house and electronically scan, transfer and
deposit the images with their bank. The result of "Check 21," the Check Clearing for the 21st
Century Act, remote capture allows a scanned "substitute" check to serve as the legal equivalent of
an original check.
With $140 billion in assets over 16 states, Regions has the wherewithal to implement the most
up-to-date technologies, and Schmitz says his bank is a leader in that arena. "We see all the new
technology as ways to expand delivery channels and make banking more efficient for customers. In the
future, we're going to see more sophistication on the 'treasury management' side. All products will
continue to evolve and improve convenience for the customers."
Schmitz points to the increasing number of branches built in the last five years as proof that
branches are necessary and represent stability. "I like the idea that customers see us as
stablethey expect more from banking than other industries," Schmitz says. "I don't see
branches
going anywhere despite all the new technology."
Rieniets, with InsBank, offers a somewhat different perspective.
"Even if you're a bank in the consumer business, trips to branches by customers have significantly
declined," he says. "So at InsBank, we asked, 'How many branches do you need for your clients?' We
think you don't need as many branches."
InsBank, a small commercial bank with $130 million in total assets, began seven years ago as an
effort by independent insurance agents to have a bank to call their own. The initial parties
involved were conservative, Rieniets says, and the project started with only $6 million in capital.
"We challenged ourselves to start without traditional branchesto use an ACH (automated
clearinghouse) conversion project, a short term for debit card transactions; we secured a courier
service; and we started developing a business model."
InsBank does not handle coin or currency. Customers use its remote capture service, "Deposit Bank,"
to scan, batch and submit checks to the bank, which are then credited to their accounts. Over 90% of
InsBank's commercial clients use remote capture, and it eliminates operations costs on both
ends.
Recognizing that building and maintaining stand-alone ATMs would be counterproductive to InsBank's
business model, customers can use any ATM out there, and the InsBank software refunds charges. "The
smarter ATMs get, the better for everyone," Rieniets says. He's referring to "smart ATMs,"
technology that is in its early phase. Smart ATMs will be able to predict customers' typical cash
withdrawals and recognize different languages, among other things. Another possible development in
banking technology is the remote issue of cashier's checks. "There's some risk," Rieniets says, "but
for the properly underwritten client, this would be a plus." Rieniets also sees
biometricsusing biological information to identify customersas part of banking's
future.
Rieniets says InsBank, even without brick-and-mortar branches, offers all the bells and whistles a
large entity such as Regions offers, but all day-to-day activity is handled electronically, Rieniets
says, so using a bank branch as an expensive billboard to demonstrate that a bank is part of the
community is unnecessary. While the bank branch has always been the place to handle "customer
moments," Rieniets says InsBank creates customer moments by taking its people and services to the
clients.
Both bankers agree that one of the biggest challenges the banking industry faces is how to balance
exponentially changing technology with the inherent risk of fraud in moving data electronically. The
more developed and futuristic the technology, the more complexity involved in maintaining security.
"We must leverage technology and proceed with the times," Schmitz says, "but we have to take care of
the people and their needs." Rieniets agrees. "Our common goal is better and safer movement of
datathat is always the priority."
Back to issue home page
|
|